Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:00

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What makes someone feel "rich enough" in different societies?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Your Android phone just got a major feature upgrade for free - including these Pixel models - ZDNET
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Was there a British ‘genocide’ of Aboriginal Australians?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
RBC Canadian Open 2025 prize money: Full payout from $9.8 million purse - Yahoo Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Watch ULA launch Amazon's 2nd batch of Kuiper internet satellites today - Space
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Main Card Results | UFC 316: Dvalishvili vs O'Malley 2 - UFC.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.